<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Policy &#8211; nutritionwonderland</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nutritionwonderland.com/category/policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nutritionwonderland.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 06:39:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-ZA</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Food Safety Legislation S.510 Stalled by One Senator</title>
		<link>https://nutritionwonderland.com/food-safety-legislation-s-510-stalled-by-one-senator/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nutrition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nutritionwonderland.com/?p=35</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ezra Klein’s excellent blog on the Washington Post website highlights a Politico story today about the status of the long awaited food safety legislation (s.510).  It is currently being held up by one senator, Tom Coburn (R) of Oklahoma.  Here is the latest: Coburn’s office confirmed to POLITICO on Tuesday that the Republican is objecting to moving forward [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ezra Klein’s <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/economic-policy/">excellent blog</a> on the Washington Post website highlights a Politico story today about the status of the long awaited <a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2010/09/dems-say-food-safety-bill-close-042174?wpisrc=nl_wonk">food safety legislation</a> (<a href="https://formspal.com/opencongress/">s.510</a>).  It is currently being held up by one senator, Tom Coburn (R) of Oklahoma.  Here is the latest:</p>
<blockquote><p>Coburn’s office confirmed to POLITICO on Tuesday that the Republican is objecting to moving forward with the bill on the grounds that <strong>it will add to the burgeoning federal budget</strong>. Coburn has become the GOP champion for demanding that legislation be fully paid for, staging or threatening filibusters this year on legislation ranging from war spending to unemployment benefits.</p></blockquote>
<div id="attachment_1470" class="wp-caption alignright">
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-1595 size-full" src="https://nutritionwonderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/coburn_from_senatewebsite-300x206-2.webp" alt="" width="300" height="206" /></p>
<p class="wp-caption-text">Tom Coburn (R) of Oklahoma</p>
</div>
<p>Coburn’s analysis of the bill seems a bit off.  A lot has been made of how the bill will effect farmers precisely <em>because</em> it puts so much of the cost of the new legislation on those who are being inspected (see our <a href="https://nutritionwonderland.com/food-safety-enhancement-act-hr-2749-advances-out-of-committee/">past coverage</a>).  In our 2009 analysis of the house bill, we found that the <a href="https://nutritionwonderland.com/food-safety-enhancement-act-hr-2749-advances-out-of-committee/#update">FDA would earn roughly $200 million dollars a year</a> from inspection fees, which would largely offset the cost of the legislation, although not entirely.</p>
<p>Coburn’s stand seems mostly obstructionist ahead of 2010 congressional races.  There is a significant groundswell against further deficit spending, especially in rural America, but there is also significant unease about the food supply in the wake of the peanut butter and spinach scares of the last five years.  The delicate balance of fees in this food safety bill was ironed out over the course of two years and it doesn’t make sense for Coburn to stand in the way of it now.  Except for the fact that he is a junior senator running for his <a href="http://www.newson6.com/Global/story.asp?S=10452949">reelection</a> in a <a href="http://www.kxii.com/news/headlines/100950989.html">couple months</a>…</p>
<p>And remember, this is a bipartisan bill.  These are <em>easier</em> to pass.</p>
<p>UPDATE: A just before the weekend note from Senate Majority Leader Henry Reid: Coburn’s position means the bill will likely not be taken up before the election in November.  What a coincidence…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Winds of Change: Antibiotics in Livestock</title>
		<link>https://nutritionwonderland.com/winds-of-change-antibiotics-in-livestock/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nutrition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 05:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health & Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nutritionwonderland.com/?p=39</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The New York Times has a really good piece on the coming rules regarding the amount of antibiotics that can be given to confinement livestock. Now, after decades of debate, the Food and Drug Administration appears poised to issue its strongest guidelines on animal antibiotics yet, intended to reduce what it calls a clear risk to [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times has a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/15/us/15farm.html">really good piece</a> on the coming rules regarding the amount of antibiotics that can be given to confinement livestock.</p>
<blockquote><p>Now, after decades of debate, the Food and Drug Administration appears poised to issue its strongest guidelines on animal antibiotics yet, intended to reduce what it calls a clear risk to human health. They would end farm uses of the drugs simply to promote faster animal growth and call for tighter oversight by veterinarians.</p>
<p>The agency’s final version is expected within months, and comes at a time when animal confinement methods, safety monitoring and other aspects of so-called factory farming are also under sharp attack. The federal proposal has struck a nerve among major livestock producers, who argue that a direct link between farms and human illness has not been proved. The producers are vigorously opposing it even as many medical and health experts call it too timid.</p>
<p>Scores of scientific groups, including the American Medical Association and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, are calling for even stronger action that would bar most uses of key antibiotics in healthy animals, including use for disease prevention, as with Mr. Rowles’s piglets. Such a bill is gaining traction in Congress.</p></blockquote>
<div id="attachment_1464" class="wp-caption alignright">
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-1597 size-full" src="https://nutritionwonderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/CAFO_cow-300x214-2.webp" alt="" width="300" height="214" /></p>
<p class="wp-caption-text">What a CAFO looks like</p>
</div>
<p>In case you are not familiar with the situation, often pigs, chickens and even cows are put into caged areas much to small for any living creature move around freely.  These confinement animal feeding operations (CAFOs) result in large amounts of animal waste that creates an ideal breeding ground for bacterial infection among the animals.  Farmers are aware of this and supplement their animal feeds with a range of antibiotics.</p>
<p>But the point here is more nuanced.  The battle over the line for antibiotic use on the farm center around their use as a <strong>growth promotion agent in animals</strong>.  Many CAFO farmers have learned that antibiotic cocktails <a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/food/food-safety/animal-feed-and-food/animal-feed-and-the-food-supply-105/chicken-arsenic-and-antibiotics/">cause their chicken to grow faster</a>, their pigs to grow larger, etc.  Ag-centric scholarly journals have dubbed these agents ‘antibiotic growth promoters’ (AGPs) and they are subject of the FDA’s scrutiny.  Here is a good review of how they have been used:</p>
<p><object id="doc_125952060191915" width="100%" height="600" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-mce-fragment="1"><embed id="doc_125952060191915" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="100%" height="600" src="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf" flashvars="document_id=37562337&amp;access_key=key-184fygnelw03ock9j6xy&amp;page=1&amp;viewMode=list" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" bgcolor="#ffffff" wmode="opaque" data="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf" name="doc_125952060191915" /></object></p>
<p>Public health officials note that <a href="http://pubsapp.acs.org/cen/news/88/i34/8834news3.html?">antibiotic resistance has grown</a> by this abundant use of antibiotics.  The use is so abundant that is far outpaces the amount of antibiotics used by human beings.  According the <a href="https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/hidden-costs-industrial-agriculture">Union of Concerned Scientists</a> – a reputable NGO &#8211; non-therapeutic use of antibiotics in livestock represents over 70% of the total amount of antibiotics created in the US.  The FDA is listening to those worries, which have been ignored up until now, with new ears.</p>
<p>Imagine if you had to live your life in a subway car with 300 of your closest friends.  It wouldn’t take long before somebody got the sniffles and, pretty soon, the whole car would be sick.  That’s the basic scenario at the CAFO that farmers are worried about.  Public health officials are worried about what happens if those resistant strains of bacteria get out of the CAFO and jump into humans.</p>
<p>This new FDA rule will not be an easy sell.  The agriculture and public health industries are extremely well connected on Capitol Hill and I’m not sure who’s dollar bills will look better to elected officials. I see major resistance shaping the end product here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Food System 2.0: Can New Approaches Make Local Food Happen?</title>
		<link>https://nutritionwonderland.com/food-system-2-0-can-new-approaches-make-local-food-happen/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nutrition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health & Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition Wonderland's 2009 Tour of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nutritionwonderland.com/?p=141</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What is the price of food? $3.99 for a gallon of milk? $0.99 for an energy bar? Complex market and policy forces make those prices. Its a process that starts far from the point of sale. Centralizing our food into fast food chains and supermarkets causes the farms that feed the system to scale up [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="post-1126" class="post box">
<div class="entry">
<p>What is the price of food? $3.99 for a gallon of milk? $0.99 for an energy bar? Complex market and policy forces make those prices. Its a process that starts far from the point of sale.</p>
<p>Centralizing our food into fast food chains and supermarkets causes the farms that feed the system to scale up into mega-sized operations. The idyllic, diverse farms of American lore were long ago converted into monocrop fields of staple grains, hog farms with hundreds of thousands of head and distribution centers bigger than football fields.</p>
<div id="attachment_1127" class="wp-caption alignright">
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-1718 size-full" src="https://nutritionwonderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/supermarket_fazen-300x213-1.webp" alt="" width="300" height="213" /></p>
<p class="wp-caption-text">A moment at the supermarket&#8230; thanks to flickr user Fazen</p>
</div>
<p>In economic terms, food has simply migrated to areas with the a comparative advantage in production. <strong>California, for example, now grows over 50% of all the vegetables in the entire country</strong> – simply because they have a 12 month growing season. But how do you make food scale back to something more reasonable, a new system in which communities connect with the food being grown there? Is it even possible, nay desirable?</p>
<p>We saw a couple examples of new approaches to these questions in the San Francisco area during our <a href="https://nutritionwonderland.com/nutrition-wonderlands-2009-tour-of-america/">Tour of America</a> recently. One deals with technology while the other with community. <strong>Both are necessary components in what should become Food System 2.0.</strong></p>
<h2>From Ideals to Reality</h2>
<p>On a sunny afternoon in San Francisco, we sat down with Melanie Cheng, founder of <a href="https://farmsreach.com/welcome/">Farmsreach.com</a>. FarmsReach does what it says: it puts farms directly within reach of their marketplace. But don’t think of the service as a digital farmers market, as we made the mistake of doing. <strong>The genius of the system comes in their measured approach to tackling the economics of local food.</strong></p>
<p>Cheng started out as a technical writer, working with Silicon Valley giant Cisco. This technical background came in handy as she began to turn her attention to food. The environmental impact of agriculture was her first focus, which culminated in the non-profit OMorganics.</p>
<p>She quickly realized the main obstacle in the sustainable agriculture world was a lack of information and marketplace – causing a shift from environmental issues into more broadly seeing food access as a uniting factor. This revelation began to shift Om Organics from information to technology, out of the non-profit sphere into what we know today as FarmsReach.com.</p>
<p><strong>Their first prototype was to connect restaurant chefs with farmers through farm co-ops and aggregators – a focus that proved too time consuming to be profitable.</strong> The core need to connect farms with commercial buyers still remained however, so with their first public release FarmsReach.com, the focus was helping farms sell directly to buyers. Cheng used an interesting approach to get these small farms to scale up to restaurant sizes: combine them.</p>
<div id="attachment_1129" class="wp-caption aligncenter">
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-1720 size-medium" src="https://nutritionwonderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/farms_reach_ui-300x196.webp" alt="" width="300" height="196" srcset="https://nutritionwonderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/farms_reach_ui-300x196.webp 300w, https://nutritionwonderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/farms_reach_ui-768x502.webp 768w, https://nutritionwonderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/farms_reach_ui-470x307.webp 470w, https://nutritionwonderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/farms_reach_ui.webp 976w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<p class="wp-caption-text">What Farms Reach Looks Like</p>
</div>
<p>It was with larger restaurant accounts that could do multiple orders at once that Farmsreach.com was born. <strong>The service aggregates sellers – in this case farmers – so restauranteurs and institutional food buyers have an easier way to interface directly with sustainable and local growers.</strong></p>
<p>Cheng’s team has tested the current platform in seven different regions, trying to slowly build out new features the community requests, like ratings for participants and inventory management for restaurants. The platform is young having only formally launched earlier this year, but it was our impression that the combination of a great idea, a strong team and patient investors will eventually make FarmsReach a big commercial component of a burgeoning new food system.</p>
<h2>The Smaller Side of Food</h2>
<p>But what if you aren’t a large restaurant? How do you get access to better food? Sara Weihmann, co-founder and director of <a href="https://www.afternic.com/forsale/alledibles.com?utm_source=TDFS&amp;utm_medium=sn_affiliate_click&amp;utm_campaign=TDFS_GoDaddy_DLS&amp;traffic_type=TDFS&amp;traffic_id=GoDaddy_DLS">All Edibles</a> sees edible landscaping as filling that important gap in the current food system. After completing a Green MBA in 2006, Weihmann looked at various environmental and social justice issues like green building and biodiesel production before the food world came calling.</p>
<p>Weihmann and her co-workers at All Edibles add edible plants to existing homes in the form of pleasant looking landscaping mostly in the ‘East Bay’ area of the San Francisco region, Berkeley and Oakland. They help homeowners connect with their food by teaching seasonal eating, planting in cycles to ensure constant food production and generally educating their customers on how to grow food.</p>
<div id="attachment_1128" class="wp-caption aligncenter">
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-1721 size-medium" src="https://nutritionwonderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/all_edibles_installation-300x199.webp" alt="" width="300" height="199" srcset="https://nutritionwonderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/all_edibles_installation-300x199.webp 300w, https://nutritionwonderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/all_edibles_installation-768x510.webp 768w, https://nutritionwonderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/all_edibles_installation-470x312.webp 470w, https://nutritionwonderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/all_edibles_installation.webp 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<p class="wp-caption-text">An example of an All Edibles Installation in the Bay Area</p>
</div>
<p><strong>The real take home message with their services is turning consumers into producers, mostly through educating clients on the processes that make local food a superior choice to conventional supermarkets.</strong> Improved local environments, food quality and convenience become selling points over the predictability of supermarkets after the clients see their food coming out of their own yards, Weihmann explained. Her goal is to eventually transform her work into a curriculum for schools and nursing homes, educating those that usually have the least connection with food – and the most time on their hands to participate.</p>
<h2>The Economic Side of Food</h2>
<p>These diverse food system interventions are merely novel at this time, experiments into a new method of food distribution that aims beyond the bottom line. No new system will succeed without a profitable economic base.</p>
<div id="attachment_1130" class="wp-caption alignright">
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-1949 size-full" src="https://nutritionwonderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/income_distribution-300x251-1-1.webp" alt="" width="300" height="251" /></p>
<p class="wp-caption-text">Food Income Chart &#8211; click for detail</p>
</div>
<p>Our specialized system has driven the costs of food down to levels that are the envy of the world – which is hard to argue – or compete – against. <a href="https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cesan.nr0.htm">Americans spend only about 10-12% of their income on food</a>, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (see this <a href="https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/05/03/business/20080403_SPENDING_GRAPHIC.html">NYTimes infographic</a> to better understand). <strong>That’s one of the lowest percentages in the world</strong>. The foods that make up that chunk of the economy are heavily influenced by subsidies from the Farm Bill, a sprawling piece of legislation that incentivizes certain crops. For example, corn farmers have received a staggering <a href="https://farm.ewg.org/progdetail.php?fips=00000&amp;progcode=corn">$56 billion in subsidies over the last 10 years</a>.</p>
<p>Farms Reach and All Edibles are attempts to change that paradigm. They are trying to circumvent the traditional food system by introducing market forces and genuine community elements to what has long been a faceless production. Remedying the larger policy apparatus around food will have to follow these trailblazing attempts to augment the system but there is another tangential issue at hand here which could change the debate – health care.</p>
<h2>From Reaction to Prevention</h2>
<p>As the US contemplates how to remake the health care system, the Congressional Budgeting Office reminds us that <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/87xx/doc8758/MainText.3.1.shtml">America already spends 16% of its GDP on healthcare</a>, by far the highest percentage in the world.  <strong>Using nutrition and novel market attempts like Farms Reach and All Edible to get the right foods into the right hands could be an important part of getting Americans to put more money into the food side of the equation – and less into fixing preventable diseases later on.</strong> Preventative medicine interventions have long been ignored, said Patricia Lebensohn, Associate Professor of Clinical Family and Community Medicine at <a href="https://integrativemedicine.arizona.edu/">The University of Arizona’s Integrative Medicine in Residency Program.</a></p>
<div id="attachment_1131" class="wp-caption alignright">
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-1723 size-full" src="https://nutritionwonderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/mediterranean_Watermelon_Salad-foodistablog-300x223-1.webp" alt="" width="300" height="223" /></p>
<p class="wp-caption-text">Mediterranean Watermelon Salad, by the Foodista Blog</p>
</div>
<p>Our current food and health states in America are efficient monetarily but woefully inefficient in other less measurable ways. Lebensohn spoke to the ways in which the Tucson-based interactive program gets front line medical practitioners to consider the person on more holistic level – and a big component of that is nutrition intervention. University of Arizona preaches a <a href="https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/in-depth/mediterranean-diet/art-20047801">Mediterranean diet</a> – heavy in whole grains, vegetables and fish – as a good approach for most practitioners. Frequently, the same residents receive training in how to use diet as a tool to make the body heal itself, added Lebensohn.</p>
<p>Connecting food to health is a major aim of the University’s program – but it goes hand in hand with other environmental, social and moral aspects of the food system that need updating. Approaching this problem from both the educational/government side like Lebensohn and the Weil Center while using new ventures from the likes of Cheng and Weihmann are just the kind of multi-faceted, entrepreneurial approaches to these large questions that are uniquely American.</p>
<p>Remember, it was only about 10,000 short years ago that we even discovered farming in the first place. It shouldn’t take that long to integrate these methods into a food system that nourishes us into the next century – and the one after that.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: nutritionwonderland.com @ 2026-04-08 06:57:45 by W3 Total Cache
-->